Saturday, December 31, 2011

Game Recap: Knicks 114 Kings 92





The Knicks took care of business tonight.


The big takeway from tonight's game is that the Kings are a bad team. Just really bad. Like I cannot understand how that team beat the Lakers last week. They are all gunners. I do not think they ran a single play all game.


The Knicks on other hand moved the ball well and looked for the open shot. They took an early lead thanks to making 8 of their first 11 three pointers. Even Renaldo Balkman got into the three point action...and missed.


Melo did not score a field goal in the first quarter however his presence tonight cannot be overstated. Any time the Kings gained some momentum, Melo slowed it down by getting to the line or making a 15 footer. He finished with 23 points, 7 boards, 5 assists, and 0 turnovers. The lack of turnovers reflects how little Melo had to force the issue tonight. This is because Toney, Jorts, Chandler, and Fields were extremely active tonight. Chandler shook off early foul trouble (dude you gotta stop that) and played his best game so far as a Knick, scoring 22 points in just 24 minutes. Chandler really is a fantastic finisher - Toney forced a few lobs to him that still ended up netting two points. A career 62% free throw shooter, Chandler is 21 for his last 24 from the charity stripe (88%).


Amar'e who? Big Jorts55 was the MAN tonight. Before the shootaround D'Antoni told reporters that he felt very comfortable starting Jorts tonight because of his size and "feel for the game." Coach D failed to mention that Jorts is literally the best three point shooter of all time. He finished 4-6 from beyond the arc (banked one in) tonight. He is also really difficult to move on the block which translated to some second chance point opportunities and solid post defense. He certainly gave Cousins all he could handle as Cousins simply could not get deep enough to do any damage. Big Jorts certainly earned himself Jared Jeffries' minutes tonight. All of Jared Jeffries' minutes. For the rest of Jeffries' career, please?


All in all, it was a well-played game so I won't expound upon the negatives (rebounding, rebounding, rebounding).


Happy New Year - On to Toronto!


PS: Marcus Thornton or Demarcus Cousins (either one) can give Vince Carter a run for his money for the NBA's Worst Body Language Award.


Knicks Bricks Writers' Early Season Predictions


Because we're always looking for new and improved ways to make ourselves look dumb and prove that we don't know what we're talking about, the Knicks Bricks team has decided to post some early season predictions for the Knicks' 2011-2012 success (or lack thereof). We will be revisiting these at each quarter post of the season to see precisely how wrong we were.

AARON

Knicks' Record: 34-32

Playoffs: 7th seed, 1st round exit

The Knicks will show occasional glimpses of a higher ceiling (conference finals material), but without a competent floor general to bring order to the offense they will be plagued by inconsistency all season, and limp into the playoffs at or just above the .500 mark. They lack the discipline and depth to sustain a solid four quarters of basketball, let alone string together more than a few victories in this compact season. As a result, they will depend too heavily on the team's franchise stars to will them to victory rather than through seasoned execution. The only thing standing between Coach D'Antoni and a pink slip will be the hope of luring Steve Nash to town next season.

SEAN

Knicks' Record: 38-28

Playoffs: 4th seed, 2nd round exit

For the record, I had the Knicks at 44-22 and a 3 seed until i saw the outcome of the Warriors game. This team is still prone to quarter-long lapses that reflect poor execution, questionable rotations (substitutions), and star deference (isolation happy). I no longer believe in golden boy Landry Fields. This team sorely needs a three point threat (no, Steve Novak is not the answer), a point guard, and a reality check. Melo and Amar'e are talented scorers, but I don't think the Knicks pose the match-up problems that they think they do.

I'm reserving judgment on Tyson Chandler. Initially I liked the signing. But that may be because in the last 10 years we have had the following players at center: Ronny Turiaf, Eddy Curry, Jerome James, Nazr Mohammed, Malik Rose, Channing Frye, Maurice Taylor, Michael Sweetney (still looking for shorts that fit), Clarence Weatherspoon, post knee injuries Antonio McDyess, Othella Harrington, and Michael Doleac. For christ's sake look at some of those names! So pardon me if I got excited for Ty Chandler and his NBA All-Defensive Team presence. Of course, 2 games in and he averages 3 rebounds a game (editor's note: many of these predictions were submitted before the Lakers game). Same old Knicks I guess.

MATT

Knicks' Record: 40-26

Playoffs: 4th seed, 2nd round exit

My heart wants to say a 3 seed, but odds are I’m just being overly optimistic and the Bockers will see themselves landing behind either Boston’s Last Stand, D-12 and Company in Orlando or a surprise team that makes a run. They have incredible talent on the front line, all of which compliment each other really well. However, there is utterly no depth behind them, and the backcourt is a giant question mark from top to bottom. Who is able to facilitate offense beside Melo? Who exactly are the shooters? Will Chandler and Mike Woodson really spark a complete defensive makeover? I think the Bockers take a good step in the right direction this year and get a little deeper, but a 3-6 seed means a 2nd round date with the Bulls or Heat. I’m just not sure they’ll know how to play like a team by then (rather than a collection of individual talents) and be able to make a run past either squad to the conference finals.

AC

Knicks' Record: 39-27

Playoffs: 3rd seed, 2nd round exit
It's a little tough sticking with a prediction of first place in the Atlantic and the third seed. I believe that D'Antoni is one of the best coaches in the NBA and there is enough talent to beat out the aging Celtics. Chandler has been a disappointment so far and the offense has looked better, but the defensive chemistry will come and shots will begin to fall.

MIKE

Knicks Record: 37-29

Playoffs: 5th seed, 1st round exit

Unlike Matt, I don't think this frontline compliments each other at all. The Knicks have two forwards who want the ball in isolation at the elbow extended. That didn't work so well last season (14-14 in the regular season, 0-4 in the playoffs) and the offseason brought a center who clogs up the lane and brings a second defender, making it difficult for Anthony and Stoudemire to get open looks. That same center has only ever thrived with excellent point guards in the pick and roll. Unfortunately, Toney Douglas seems chronically incapable of learning how to distribute the ball and I have very little faith that Baron Davis will return to 2002-2007 levels. I know he's an incredible player when invested, but he hasn't cared in 4 years and I don't think that the switch will be as easy to flip at 32 as it was at 26; Baron is going to find that out the hard way.

The worst part is that I think the Tyson Chandler signing has set the Knicks' ceiling at 4-5 seeds and 1st or 2nd round exits for the next 4 years. In other words, we're the North Atlanta Hawks. And there was much rejoicing.

Preview Game 4: Knicks (1-2) at Sacramento Kings (1-2)

The Knicks finish up their lone West Coast road trip of the season at Sacramento tonight. The team hopes to end the calendar year on a positive note after two subpar performances earlier this week. If the Knicks are to salvage a win tonight it will be without power forward Amar'e Stoudemire who will reportedly not suit up due to the sprained ankle he suffered in Los Angeles. Like the Knicks, the Kings are coming off of back to back losses in which they allowed an average of 104.5 points per game. Sacramento has won 4 of their last 5 games against New York and have no noteworthy injuries heading into tonight's matchup.

Key Matchups: With Amar'e out, look for Melo to shoot early and often against John Salmons.

Ominous note: The third string point guard for the Kings is named Isaiah Thomas.

Defending D'Antoni


I grew up pushin snowflake to [cats] who were pro-base. The stress’ll take a young [cat] and give him an old face.
-Shawn Carter


The current consensus is that Mike D’Antoni’s days as a coach of the Knickerbockers are numbered. From the beginning, D’Antoni has been facing an uphill battle because he was pushing offense in a city that appreciates defense and toughness. If the Knicks lose to the Kings on Saturday night, the cries for D’Antoni’s head will be the loudest they have ever been, and rightfully so, because for the first time in four years the Knicks are actually expected to be good.

Last year the Knicks finished over .500 for the first time since the 2000-2001 season. Let that sink in. A decade of losing records, a ten year span in which every team in the NBA except the Knicks finished with a winning record at least once. Look it up. The Clippers had 47 wins in 2005-2006. The Bobcats, believe it or not, had 44 wins two years ago. That Game 5 loss against the Raptors was a long time ago. Back then Shaggy was cranking out number one hits, William Peterson wasn't really famous yet for CSI (well, he still isn't famous because I had to look up his name on IMDB), and we still had a year before knowing that you could get red tops from an industrious youth named Bodie. So what does Mike D’Antoni get for ending a decade of futility? It certainly didn’t get him a contract extension. Instead it gives him the wonderful opportunity to read about how he doesn’t know how to coach defense, or that he is just keeping the seat warm for Phil Jackson.

This a good time for an important caveat. Phil Jackson is a better coach than D'Antoni and I'd fire D'Antoni if Phil Jackson wanted the job. (Ditto for Jeff Van Gundy because everyone loves JVG, but I don’t think he works for the Knicks again as long as Jimmy Boy is in charge). Jackson is probably the greatest NBA coach of all time, and if he wanted to wear all eleven of his rings at once he would need to be in sandals (unless he and Jenny are into some freaky stuff and the eleventh ring is one for the dong). But I don’t know what the Zen Master wants to do, and it is highly doubtful anyone who does know him can predict what he is going to do. It’s too risky to put all of the eggs in Phil Jax’s basket. And for the Knicks it’s foolish because they have one of the best coaches in the NBA. So, if you think Phil Jackson is a better coach than Mike D’Antoni, please stop reading because I agree.

Not only is Big Chief Triangle the GOAT in NBA circles, he also has earned the important distinction of being a defensive-minded coach. As the old maxim goes defense wins championships, and Phil has eleven rings so he must be a great defensive coach. While Jackson is certainly a good defensive coach, he really is a better offensive coach. According to Basketball Reference’s offensive and defensive ratings, Phil Jackson’s eleven championship teams ranked 6th defensively on average and about 3rd on average offensively. Of course being in the top six in defense is pretty damn good, but being in the top three on offense is obviously better. There is an extreme outlier on defense and an outlier on offense, but even after removing those two, it is clear that Jackson’s teams were well balanced teams that excelled more on offense than defense.

The Showtime Lakers coached by future defensive master and backstabber, Pat Riley, were less balanced. Ironically, Riley is probably the reason everyone thinks the Knicks need to be a defensive team. This ignores that Riley probably became a defensive coach because he had to. He couldn't run Showtime with Doc Rivers flanked by Starks and Charles Smith on the wings. Those Lakers teams won five championships in nine years by finishing first three times and second twice in offense while being average on defense in a 23 team league. One year they finished tenth and in two of those years they finished ninth, which translates to 12th or 13th in a 30 team league. Coincidentally, that's not too far off what D'Antoni was able to accomplish during his four years in Phoenix. They finished first twice and second twice in offensive rating, and 13th, 16th twice, and 17th in defensive rating. D'Antoni's Suns teams and the Showtime Lakers have plenty of differences, but the larger point is that teams can win championships by being a great offensive team and an average defensive team. The NFL is outgrowing the myth that defense wins championships as many of the best teams are great offensive teams (similarly the myth of running the ball in the playoffs is flying out the window). The NBA is taking longer because many of the recent champions like the Spurs, Pistons, and Celtics weren't good on offense.

Without so much bad luck and Robert Sarver's penny pinching, the D'Antoni Suns probably would have won a championship. The first full SSOL year was 2004-2005 and the Suns led the NBA with 62 victories. They ended up losing to the eventual champion Spurs in a five game Western Conference finals, but lost the first two while Jim Jackson started for the injured Joe Johnson. In the five games against the Spurs a 22- year- old Amar'e Stoudemire averaged 37 ppg against Tim Duncan who was in his defensive prime (a lot of it was probably strategic, as the Spurs wanted to keep Nash out of the lane, but 37 points is 37 points). Expectations were high for the Suns and for Amar'e, but as everyone knows Amar'e missed all but three games with a knee injury the following year, the Hawks overpaid for Joe Johnson the first time, and the team traded their first rounder and Quentin Richardson to the Knicks (after selling the 7th pick in the previous year to the Bulls, who drafted Luol Deng).

Even after replacing 3/5 of their starting lineup, the Suns were able to make the Western Conference finals again. This time though, they lost to the Mavs in six games, and used a seven man rotation of Steve Nash, Shawn Marion, Raja Bell, Boris Diaw, Tim Thomas (yes, that Tim Thomas), Leandro Barbosa, and James Jones, with a "break glass in case of emergency" Eddie House sprinkled in. Seriously, how many coaches could do that? Either Raja Bell or Boris Diaw is the third banana, and Tim Thomas was an important piece and starter. The starting frontline was Marion, Diaw, and Thomas. Even Kwame Brown could (and did) score against that front line. The offseason was more of the same as the Suns sold two first rounders including the 21st pick to the Celtics who drafted Rajon Rondo!

The 2006-2007 Suns was probably the best SSOL team, but the interweb says that they lost in the second round to the eventual champion Spurs in six games. That was the year that Robert Horry hip checked Steve Nash into the scorer's table, and Amar'e and Boris Diaw stepped off the bench and onto the court in defense of their team mate during the altercation. Under the ridiculously stupid NBA rule both were suspended for the pivotal Game 5 in Phoenix and the Suns were forced to use six players in a blowout. The next offseason they gave the Sonics two first round picks to take on Kurt Thomas' contract, and then blew it up in February by trading Marion for Shaq. That team lost in the first round to the Spurs, but lost the first game after Tim Duncan hit a crucial fourth quarter three to tie the game.

Add it all up and it's a pretty good run. The SSOL Suns made the playoffs every year, lost twice in the Conference Finals, and average 58 wins over four years. D'Antoni had rightfully earned a reputation as one of the best coaches in the NBA, but he was a flawed coach who didn't practice defense enough and Phoenix allowed him to leave. Miraculously the Knicks were able to get a coach who averaged more wins over four years than the franchise was able to win in a single season since Bill Clinton was president. That's pretty amazing, and it's even more amazing because it was the 1992-93 season and George H.W. Bush was president when the season started. Fans were excited to get an accomplished coach like D'Antoni, but they probably weren't excited enough. True, he never won a championship in Phoenix, but the list of current NBA coaches who have won a championship is Greg Poppovich, Rick Carlisle, and Doc Rivers (and the latter two were given the opportunity for some growing pains). 58 wins per season and two conference finals despite some real bad luck and a crappy owner makes for an elite coach.

It was understood that the first two years of D'Antoni's four year deal would be transition years as the team purged bad contracts to make a run at the vaunted 2010 free agent class. In D'Antoni's first year with the Knicks, he coached Chris Duhon, Nate Robinson, David Lee, Al Harrington, Wilson Chandler, Quentin Richardson, and Jared Jeffries to 32 wins. Lee and Chandler are good players, Al Harrington is a nice bench player, and Jared Jeffries is a story for another day, but Duhon and Richardson can't crack the Magic rotation, and Nate is out the league and might be for a while. In the words of Homer Simpson, “I'll take the crab juice.” The following year was more of the same as the Knicks won 28 games with a couple of fourth/fifth bananas and a litany of vagabonds.

So last year was supposed to be the reward for D'Antoni's work the first two years. He could have signed with Chicago to coach Derrick Rose, but he turned them down to come to the Knicks. Of course the Knicks struck out in free agency and settled for plan H – Amar'e Stoudemire and Raymond Felton. Not bad, but not a homerun either. The current team is built around the frontline of Amar'e, Melo, and Chandler. A frontline that is definitely better than the Marion, Diaw, Tim Thomas frontline that made a Conference Finals. A frontline that may contend for a championship, but is probably a year away because of a mixed and matched backcourt. Unfortunately, D'Antoni might not be around to coach a fifth year because fans/talking heads think a defensive coach is needed.

Does D'Antoni need to improve the Knicks 23rd ranking in Defense last year? Yes, a thousand times yes. Does he also need to improve the Knicks 7th ranking in Offense? The answer is also yes. This is not an ideal roster because Amar'e and Melo are not the passers that LeBron and Wade are, and Toney Douglas starts at point guard. Whoever the point guard ends up being this year or next year, he won't be as good as Steve Nash at his peak. D'Antoni will have to adjust and if he is given a fair chance, he will. At the end of the day he will win with offense first, and there is nothing wrong with that.

Friday, December 30, 2011

Down on the Farm: D-Fenders 117 Bayhawks 112


The Bayhawks lost to the D-Fenders (why would they get rid of the extra "e"? I can't stress enough how silly D-League names are) 117-112 last night. I actually watched a tiny bit of the game, and it's safe to say that the level of play in the D-League leaves something to be desired. I watched my new mainest man, Chris Daniels, and he looked like a bit of a stiff. He missed a bunny to tie the game with about 15 seconds left, but still had a monster game. I still think he might be worth a look on a 10 day contract at some point this year. For what it's worth, all D-League games can be streamed for free by clicking the "Futurecast" link on the right side of the D-League's website. Here are the lines of note:

Chris Daniels: (Texas A&M - Corpus Christi - 27 years old - 7'0" C): 32 points (11-14 FG, 1-1 3PT), 9 reb., 3 assists, 8 turnovers ---- I get the sneaking suspicion that D-League play involves a lot of guys jacking up shots, gunning for a shot to break into the league. That might explain the 8 turnovers. Even then, you can't argue with the numbers this guy is putting up; 18.3 PPG, 10.4 RPG, 59% FG, 39% 3PT. The most important statistic might be his height.

Devin Green: (Hampton - 29 years old - 6'7" SG): 10 points (4-11 FG, 0-3 3PT), 3 reb., 4 assists ---- shockingly similar line to the previous game. Not sure what this guy was doing on the roster so late in the preseason. He seems to be struggling to get his in the D-League.

Kyle Spain: (San Diego State - 24 years old - 6'5" SG): 18 points (7-10 FG, 2-4 3PT), 3 reb., 1 assist --- seems like this guy might be something of a gunner, as he's taken 63 shots from behind the arc in 14 games this season. Unfortunately, he only knocks them down at about a 35% clip, and this is his second year in the D-League.

Offensively Offensive

Let me preface this entire post by saying it is extremely early and I am not typically an alarmist. We are a baby step into the marathon of the season, but what I have seen so far is so disturbing I can’t help but voice my concerns. Still, plenty of time to right the ship.

I am sure in the coming days/weeks, we’ll have a piece on our individual feelings on Mike D’Antoni and the current state of his tenure and future here as the Knicks coach. Personally, I don’t fall into the devout followers of either camp; I don’t think he has earned an extension thus far, but I also don’t want to see him axed tomorrow. He finally has a full complement of players that he believes can contend at a championship level, so I think we should give him the opportunity to excel with this cast.

However, I do have some very strong opinions on what I see as major systemic issues with our identity right now and, even crazier for a commentary on the man commonly referred to as Mike _’Antoni, I am not nearly as (relatively) concerned about the defense as I am the offense.

First things first, I want to address what is actually working offensively… Well, that was quick. Seriously though, I do think there is a single effective component, and I want to finally put to bed all of the ridiculous claims made by every media talking head (or in Stephen A.’s case, screaming head): Carmelo’s reputation of being a “ball stopper” is not what is hurting this offense. In fact, Melo’s presence is literally the only component that I feel is working at the moment. For Melo’s part, we all know he is probably the most gifted scorer in the game. Sure, Kobe is as savvy as they come. Durant can get his silky shot up over anyone at any time. But pound for pound, no one has a more varied and deep offensive arsenal than Melo. Say what you want about his inability to convert his natural physical tools into impact defense, but offensively, he has no peer. He is aggressive in getting to the line, he has range (albeit he can be streaky), he is a virtuoso from the elbow, a great finisher, has a quick trigger on an elite midrange game and the ability to handle and create for others.

In the past, the criticism of Melo and his “fit” in SSOL was his propensity for being a ball stopper and freezing out his teammates. I wouldn’t say that opinion was completely unwarranted in the past. However, I have seen a real change in Melo this year; I think due to the additional responsibility that D’Antoni has placed in his hands to initiate offense. Melo has been prominently featured as the ball handler in pick and roll situations, and has really embraced that role and made a concerted effort to keep his head up and try and find teammates. Only when the opportunity to enable his teammates’ scoring chances doesn’t materialize does he put his head down and try to find his own shot. To say that Melo isn’t working in this offense is a great misinterpretation of the heart of the issue: what exactly is “this offense”?

Mike D’Antoni is consistently hailed as an offensive genius. When Bibby signed, he was enthralled with the opportunity to play in “this offense.” At halftime of the Lakers game, Baron Davis, the heir apparent at PG once his back heals, gushed to Craig Sager about “this offense” being a dream. Maybe I’m not as perceptive as I used to be, and I completely understand the draw of the vaunted Seven Seconds or Less offense that gained traction as the offense of the ‘00s, much like the Triangle offense was of the 90’s. However, that isn’t the offense being run here in NY this year. No one is pushing the ball and trying to get the opponent back on their heels. No one is looking for quick shots predicated on ball movement. In fact, there is literally no movement on offense at all, whether it be ball or player.

My initial reaction is this is due to a lack of true PG. I love Toney Douglas for what he is; a physical aggressive defender who can really fill it up when he gets hot, but he isn’t a distributor. It’s evident, even this early in the season, that he doesn't have the floor vision at this point in his career to find opportunities for his teammates as, or before, they develop. His recognition is really trailing at the moment, as he is only seeing opportunities after the window has already begun to close, putting his teammates in positions where they draw a charge, turn it over or hoist a contested shot. I can’t count how many times Chandler has dove to the hoop after setting a pick, only to not be found for an easy 2. Maybe that all changes when B Diddy gets healthy.

So, I will place a little of the burden for the lack of offense execution on personnel, particularly at the PG spot. But, outside of that glaring hole at PG, I can’t understand why this “offensive genius” of a coach can’t make the remaining pieces work. We have an athletic front line that features 3 talented offensive players in their own right: Chandler, an elite finisher and great screener; STAT, one of the most explosive bigs in recent memory with an impressive outside stroke; and Melo, potentially the most potent scorer in the league. We have a young 2 in Fields who, while not an elite shooter, is capable, and does a great job of being unselfish with the ball, and making the right pass that often leads to the assist (aka the "hockey assist").

Yet, the Knicks aren’t putting these pieces in place to score in a team context. Rather, their offense has somehow migrated from an active, aggressive, pushing attack that was criticized for lacking a half court game, to a plodding, motionless offense of rotating one on one performances. In the half court, for the past 3 years, the offense has centered on a potent pick and roll/pop game featuring David Lee or Amar’e. This year, Chandler is setting picks and diving to the hoop, but no one is looking for him. Amar’e is doing nothing by hoisting 18 footers after 5 jab steps, instead of creating scoring opportunities by utilizing the pick and pop that was so effective last year, or slipping the screen (that he is loathe to actually set) and exploiting his greatest strength: rolling downhill to the hoop, catching in traffic and finishing on more plodding bigs. It’s admirable that Amar’e is really further developing his perimeter jumper -- that will be important as his career goes on and his athleticism fades -- but, for now, he needs to be more aggressive in rolling to the hoop, and his coach needs to put him in that position.

I have no idea where that aspect of the offense has gone, which is troubling because New York finally have a half court player in terms of Melo that can create when our up-tempo attack of yesteryear doesn’t create buckets. With Fields, along with the big 3 in the frontcourt, The Bockers have some incredible athletes and finishers in transition, which should be a major strength of the squad. But they are not running or pushing the envelope at all and getting easy buckets. There are no easy hoops, no transition, no ball movement in the half court, no off the ball movement to set picks or come off screens to get open looks. Seemingly, 90% of the Knicks' shots right now are contested or difficult, and while the personnel exists to make those tough looks, in order to be an elite offense, those challenging looks need to be supplemented with easy baskets. The Bockers simply aren’t getting those at the moment and, even more alarming, it is because D’Antoni is simply is not putting his players in position to create easy buckets. Any offense, especially SSOL, requires transition baskets, ball and player movement working in unison to unlock its potential. To lack ALL of those components is scary, especially when perimeter shooting is not their strong suit.

While Chandler and Melo in particular exhibited a lot of aggressiveness against the Lakers, it was in a one on one context, not in terms of a two man game or finishing looks created by teammates. That and STAT’s one man clinic on “how to miss 18 footer” were all the first team offense could muster. The second team, while showing a little more ball movement, simply passed it around behind the arc and chucked the second they had a free opportunity, instead of making the extra pass for an open shot or venturing into the great unknown of the paint.

I can’t, for all my effort, identify what exactly is the systematic ethos of this offense. The Knicks have a coach that has typically preached ball movement and quick shots, but are settling for a steady rotation of one on one effort, while the other four players stand around, committed to neither getting back on D nor rebounding. The Bockers have been known for their transition offense, but they aren’t pushing the ball in the least, despite a group that can really run the floor and finish. They have had resounding success with the PnR game the past 3 years, but now that they have another dive man in Chandler, they’ve abandoned that aspect of the game. No one is sharing the ball, and no one is trying to get their teammates open looks beside Melo.

Again, I am sure some of this can be attributed to a lack pure point, but for a coach that has always been known as an innovator on offense and a bystander on defense, it’s not the defense that concerns me. What troubles me is that for all things that the Knicks don’t seem to be doing at the moment, I can’t really identify exactly what they ARE doing offensively. If you asked me to describe the offensive strategy at the moment, my response would probably be “Melo”, but, unlike in his youth, it isn’t his fault that the offense centers around him so dominantly; the coach has presented no viable alternative. D’Antoni finally has all the pieces, and in the early going seems to have completely abandoned his talent for putting them in a position to succeed as a unit that is greater than a sum of their parts. The focus on defensive improvement won’t mean a thing if the Knicks continue to flounder so extensively offensively, and the focus on D’Antoni’s future will be a moot point, as it will be Phil Jackson’s problem to deal with in ’12 if it doesn’t improve.

Lakers 99 Knicks 82: To Live and Die in LA (mostly die)

Coming into the game, there was reason for optimism that this would be an opportunity for the Knicks to get themselves a big early season road win. Andrew Bynum was still serving his suspension for clubbing JJ Barea in the playoffs, and the Lakers starting lineup featured Josh McRoberts and Devin Ebanks at forward opposite the Knicks’ stars. The hope was that the previous night against Golden State was simply a trap game, with the Knicks looking past a Warriors team without Steph Curry to their higher profile match up with the Lakers. Unfortunately, those hopes were quickly and repeatedly dashed throughout the evening, as the Knicks turned in a subpar performance, losing to the Lakers 99-82, in a game that never really seemed in doubt from the opening minutes.

What went wrong? More like what didn’t? The Knicks allowed the Lakers to score 31 points in the 1st on 63% from the floor, including 16 points in the paint on the Knicks' refurbished frontline to take a 7 point lead into the 2nd. I would love to tell you the Knicks defense improved from their 1st quarter struggles, but the Knicks barely forced a miss in the 2nd quarter, with the Lakers extending their halftime lead to 12, 63-51. The Lakers shot a robust 72% for the half, their most prolific shooting half since they shot 77.1% against Orlando in 1999. While the Knicks made a run to open the 3rd, with their improved defense holding the Lakers to 17 points in the quarter, they were never able to really swing momentum. 13 of those 17 came from an impressive scoring binge from Kobe Bryant, including a 4 point play when he was fouled by Renaldo Balkman in the act… 30 feet from the hoop… with 2 seconds left on the shot clock. It was that kind of evening.

The Knicks trimmed the deficit to 8 to start the 4th, but a 17-3 Lakers run to start the quarter put the game out of reach, with the Knicks' first hoop from the floor finally coming half way through the period on a Carmelo Anthony drive. The Knicks have now lost to Kobe and the Lakers 9 times in row, dating back to February 2007 and, according to Shaq, this was the worst Knicks shooting performance in 4 years, at 31.3% from the floor. Not a lot of positives to take away, other than the game is over.

In terms of individual performances, I want to focus on the Knicks, but I’d be remiss in not mentioning the efficient performances by the two Lakers stars. Kobe went for 28 points on just 17 shots, and Pau Gasol added 16 points, 10 rebounds, 5 assists and 2 blocks in similarly efficient fashion on just 12 shots. Additionally, the Artist Formerly Known as Ron Artest, Metta World Peace, gave the Knicks no peace, as he harassed half the Knicks team at one point or another, leading to an impressive +20 +/- for the game in just 25 minutes. The Lakers scored 44 points in the paint, shot 52.1% when it was all said and done, including 9 of 16 from deep.

For the Knicks, a bright spot was Carmelo Anthony, who put up 27 points on just 14 shots, and added 7 rebounds, 5 assists and was generally the only functional part of the offense (more on that in another post). He was aggressive all night long, getting to the line repeatedly, although his 5 turnovers were the portrait of a man trying to force the action towards the end of the evening when his teammates had really seemed to abandon him.

Tyson Chandler had the best game of his young Knicks career, as he played aggressively and with purpose, turning in a 13 point/11 rebound double-double, adding 3 steals, 2 blocks and getting himself to the line 14 times. An encouraging performance by Chandler. The Knicks ability to get to the stripe was really the only team positive to take away from the performance, as they shot 41 free throws and knocked down 34 of them, a 20 point advantage at the line over the Lakers. I shudder to think how badly this outcome would have looked if that advantage didn’t exist.

Amar’e Stoudemire turned in a performance that was unblemished by success, save for the nice corner 3 he swished for the 3rd time this season. STAT went 4-17 from the floor for 15 points, turned the ball over 4 times, didn’t manage a single assist (typical) and only registered 2 boards (sadly, even more typical). To make matters worse, he turned his ankle in the 4th quarter, headed to the locker room, and appears to be questionable for the NYE game against the Kings. That’ll put a bow on that performance.

The starting backcourt of Fields and Douglas combined for 8 assists, which itself is not an impressive number from a starting backcourt, but combined with Melo’s 5, the starting 1 through 3 men accounted for 13 of the Knicks' 15 assists. Although they both struggled to score, they played well at times and the team seemed much more effective on both ends when they were out there together, much like last year, as Toney posted a -6 +/- (impressive for a 19 point loss) and Fields played the Lakers to a draw at a 0 +/-.

For the bench, I was always told if you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all. In trying to find any rays of hope on the pine, here’s all I’ve got: Novak showed the stroke the Knicks are hoping he provides from deep, knocking down 2 of his 3 3pt attempts. Balkman played hard and was active in his brief 10 minute stint, although a little too active on the 4 point play he handed Kobe at a key point for momentum in the 3rd. Finally, Billy Walker showed a lot of hustle in diving for loose balls, coming up with 3 impressive steals, but outside of that effort, he managed to only contribute a stat of line 1 point, 1 assist and no rebounds in 17 minutes on the floor. Save for his 5 personal foul, it would have been easy to forget he was out there.

All in all, it was a tale of two halves; unfortunately, there was nothing positive about either. The first half featured an epically bad defensive performance, and while the defense tightened noticeably in the 2nd half, the offense completely disappeared at its expense. There was little to no ball movement after the crisp first few minutes of the game, no transition game to speak of, and although the help defense was impressive at times, the help to the help was nonexistent, leading to easy after easy hoop off the pick and roll. The defense was so bad that D’Antoni said he thought about rolling out a zone defense in the 2nd half, despite the fact that he had not had an opportunity to install the scheme in practice. I’ll just let that statement sink in for its alarming indictment on the Knicks' man to man defense, as well as their lack of preparation as a team.

It’s difficult to not be alarmed by this second straight subpar performance, but it is important to keep in perspective that it often takes a team a while to gel with new pieces to start the season. Still, with potentially the softest part of the Knicks schedule coming in the next 10 days, the Bockers really need to right some of their wrongs sooner rather than later and get on the same page against a slew of lottery bound teams that can’t match their talent level. Hopefully the turnaround starts Saturday against the Kings.

Stoudemire Sprains Ankle

Newsday is reporting that Amar'e Stoudemire sprained his ankle in last night's loss to the Lakers. It is unclear how much, if any, time he'll miss.

It will be interesting to see how this affects the Knicks on offense. Frankly, Amar'e has looked lost on offense this year, too often settling for a jumper that is not falling like it normally does (unless he's behind the arc -- 3 for 3!). New York was only a .500 team following the Anthony trade last year and at times it appeared that Anthony and Stoudemire were redundant players who didn't know how to compliment each other's skills. With the addition of Tyson Chandler clogging up the lane, the problem seems to be exaggerated for Stoudemire this year who has shot a combined 9 for 31 (29%) from the field in the Knicks' two losses.

I'm not saying that the Knicks will be better on offense without Amar'e, but it will be interesting to see if this opens up space for Anthony to operate and for Chandler to start diving to the basket for some easy lobs (although a competent point guard would probably help more than having Stoudemire out). Either way, this is more bad news for a Knicks team that has looked totally out of sorts the last two nights.

Thursday, December 29, 2011

Commercials



If you watch enough sports on TV, you'll start to see the same commercials over and over again. The 2007 baseball playoffs were haunted by those ubiquitous Frank TV commercials. The 2006 NCAA tournament ran that horrible Applebee's commercial spoofing the Gilligan's Island theme song at pretty much every commercial break.

This winter: it's that horrifying LMFAO Budweiser commercial. That thing is a bigger atrocity than the Khmer Rouge and I have lost respect for every person who agreed to appear in it (I'm looking at you, Luke Wilson). Also, is it just me or is LMFAO Milli Vanilli reincarnated?

Down on the Farm - Bayhawks 109 Mad Ants 94


With a vigorous hat tip to the good folks over at River Avenue Blues (the best Yankees blog going), this segment will provide an update on the Knicks' D-League affiliate, the Erie Bayhawks. This is the first year that the Knicks have had their own D-League team to try and develop talent. This segment will probably be less useful for basketball , where draft picks go straight to the NBA, than it is in baseball, where teams' best prospects have to work their way through several levels of the minor leagues before making the show.

That said, the NBA likes to point out that 15% of the players in the NBA have spent time in the D-League, including Matt Barnes, Lou Williams, Jordan Farmar and other solid rotation players. As such, this segment will be useful because 1) the Knicks' bench, as we've seen already this year, is painfully thin (why Renaldo Balkman -- or as they call him over at NY Magazine, Humpty --is getting minutes is beyond me), so the Bayhawks might be able to provide some much needed depth; in fact, several Bayhawks players, such as Mychel Thompson and Corey Higgins, have found their way onto NBA rosters already this year, 2) the names of the teams are silly, and that's always fun (Sioux Falls Skyforce?!?!?), and 3) we'll get to check in on some of our favorite NBA and college washouts (Jamal Tinsley was the #1 pick in this year's D-League draft, Ricky Davis is making his Maine Red Claws debut this evening, Antoine Walker is trying to pay off gambling debts for the Idaho Stampede, and doofy Cornell great Jeff Foote is stomping around for the Springfield Armor...all of those things are true).


******************************************************

The Bayhawks beat the Fort Wayne Mad Ants (what'd I tell you about those team names?) last night. Here are the interesting lines:

D.J. Kennedy: (St. John's -22 years old -6'6" SG/SF): 17 points (7-11 FG, 2-5 3PT), 10 reb., 6 assists ---- Not sure this kid will ever make it to the show, but he appears to be putting up good numbers.

Devin Green: (Hampton - 29 years old - 6'7" SG): 8 points (4-10 FG, 0-3 3PT), 4 reb., 2 assists ---- one of the last guys cut from this year's roster in the preseason, it makes sense for the Knicks to keep him around in case there are any more injuries.

Chris Daniels: (Texas A&M - Corpus Christi - 27 years old - 7'0" C): 15 points (6-8 FG, 1-3 3PT), 7 reb., 5 assists ---- I'm fascinated by this guy. He's averaging 16 points, 10.7 boards, 2.2 blocks and 1.0 3PTM. He seems like he'd be a great fit and couldn't possibly have less of an idea what to do on the court than Jerome Jordan, who looked lost in limited minutes last night. He got a look with the Lakers in training camp, but is back with the Bayhawks. Full disclosure: I haven't watched any Bayhawks games this year, so there must be a fatal flaw in Daniels' game because 7-footers who can play don't rot away in the D-League. Especially not when the big club needs size so desperately.

Kyle Goldcamp: (Gannon (???) - 26 years old - 6'10" PF): 17 points (8-13 FG, 0-0 3PT), 11 reb., 4 assists ---- This is his third year on the Bayhawks and he went to a school I've never heard of. I get the sense he's the basketball equivalent of an "organizational player," but the big fella had a nice game, so I'll give him the shout out here.

Warriors 92 Knicks 78: Live by the Sword, Die by the Sword


On Christmas Day, Carmelo Anthony was able to bail the Knicks out of a wilting 3rd quarter performance with late game heroics. Last night, against the normally defensively-challenged Golden State Warriors, Anthony could only muster one point in the 4th quarter as the Knicks' fragile six-point lead evaporated. I bring this up not to excoriate Anthony for not being "clutch" (a term that my sabermetrically-inclined baseball mind cringes at), but to point out the more troubling trend that the Knicks offense in the past two games has lacked any semblance of motion, fluidity or vision.

A look at last night's 4th quarter shot chart tells much of the story of why the Knicks struggled so much on offense, mustering a measley 14 points and only 8 points in the first 9 minutes of the period. The first shot in the paint came from a garbage time put-back from Jerome Jordan with 3:47 left to play and the game already out of hand. When the Knicks needed a bucket as the Warriors started their barrage, the offense consisted of: 1) pass the ball to Amar'e Stoudemire or Anthony, 2) jab step (repeat as needed), 3) hoist up a 12-20 foot jump shot. When they weren't doing that, they were turning the ball over while attempting to run this "play." It worked brillaintly on Sunday because Anthony worked his magic and reminded us what a gifted scorer he is. That said, it's not a viable way to win games over the course of a grueling regular season.

The truly troubling part of this is that the Warriors are not a team with an intimidating interior defense. We all lived through the David Lee era in New York and know that opposing teams should be able to score inside at will against a team where he is masquerading as a center. Kwame Brown, who was the other Warriors big on the floor during crunch time, is a washed up never-was who a team with competent forwards should be able to score against at will. The Knicks will need to find some consistency out of their point guard play, whether it is Toney Douglas maturing into a viable point guard (unlikely), some necromancer rising Mike Bibby from the dead (impossible), or hoping the Baron Davis can tap back into the desire and talent that made him so electrifying in the 2007 season (wouldn't bet on it). Unless that happens, the Knicks will continue to be susceptible to these scoring droughts, despite having two of the best scorers in the game, because there is no one to right the ship when things get out of hand and make sure that Anthony and Stoudemire get the ball where they need it, not 20 feet out with their backs to the basket.

It would be easy to blame the defense for this loss, but that's not fair. If you had told me before the game that the Knicks would hold the Warriors to 92 points, I would have wagered good money that the Knicks would have cruised to victory. The way this team is constructed, it should be able to score over 92 points per night, particularly against the Warriors. That said, I'd like to have the airing of grievances about Tyson Chandler. The first post on this blog was supposed to be me railing against the Chandler signing, but that's a stale story, so I'll hit the main points here. The idea that Tyson Chandler is a Defensive Stallwart, Amazing Teammate, and Leader of Men is simply the narrative du jour and not indicative of the type of player he has been his whole career or who we can expect him to be going forward. He went from draft bust, to guy who could catch passes from Chris Paul, to guy with bad feet who got a trade rescinded, to guy with bad feet who misses lots of games for a mediocre Charlotte Bobcats team, to salary dump, to gritty defensive center for a championship team. The guy has been in the league since 2001 and was never considered a marquee. Late bloomers exist, but I think we had a sufficient sample size from Tyson Chandler to have a good idea of the type of limited player he is. Tyson Chandler is a useful player and a solid starting center in the NBA, but he is not the missing piece the Knicks needed to put them over the top and by signing him the Knicks have foreclosed themselves from the possibility of adding that piece.

There's nothing worse than paying a guy for a career year, unless you're paying that guy for a career year that is based on intangibles. This is James Posey 2.0. What I saw last night was a center who got stupid, ticky-tack fouls, got frustrated, and then acted the fool by taking a technical foul late in the game. Mind you, this is the second time that he's been hit with a late technical foul. Chandler was supposed to bring maturity, focus, and teamwork to this team. None of these things have been apparent in the first two games of the season. If they wanted a center with limited offensive ability who tried really hard on defense and talked a lot, why didn't the Knicks just keep Ronnie Turiaf? He cost a hell of a lot less and they wouldn't have been stuck with him for the next four years. Now the Knicks go into a game against the Lakers tonight, the second night of a West Coast back-to-back, and it looks like when the dust settles they'll be one Carmelo Anthony miracle away from starting the season 0-3.

P.S. Maybe that Christmas Day win wasn't so impressive on further review? The Celtics got smoked by a Hornets team that did not have Eric Gordon last night. Yikes.